Archive for Bob Robson

Ariz. lawmaker cites compromise on billboards

A new proposal to resolve a conflict over electronic billboards that pitted advertisers against astronomers would allow the glowing signs in the Phoenix area while banning them from regions with clusters of world-class telescopes.

Observatory officials, attracted to Arizona for its generally dark night skies, have said they feared their telescopes’ vision would be blurred by light pollution if more electronic billboards are allowed around the state.

Meanwhile, the billboard industry said requiring it to dismantle its video display boards would harm both the industry and the 4,200 businesses that use the signs to advertise.

An astronomy industry study said it has $1 billion invested in the state, while the billboard industry said its clients employ 158,000 people.

A compromise resulting from talks between representatives of the two industries includes restrictions on where new electronic billboards can be located and a new statewide limit on operating hours for electronic billboards, said Rep. Bob Robson, R-Chandler.

“From the onset, both parties wanted to compromise, which is good. This will be a long-term solution in keeping two industries that are not necessarily totally compatible but need to survive,” Robson said.

A map released by Robert Johnson, a billboard industry representative, indicated the compromise would permit existing and new electronic billboards in the Phoenix area in south-central Arizona and much of southwestern Arizona while banning them from regions to the north, east and south.

“We get to do business in the zone and they get to do business outside the zone,” Johnson said. “It’s a compromise that we think allows both industries to exist and go about their business.”

The no-sign areas would include Tucson in southern Arizona and Flagstaff in northern Arizona. Both have clusters of major observatories.

Robson was the sponsor of a bill to legalize approximately 70 existing electronic billboards, nearly all of which are in the Phoenix area, following a 2011 court decision that ruled them illegal under a state highway beautification law.

However, Gov. Jan Brewer last month vetoed Robson’s bill, saying she wasn’t willing to jeopardize the observatories and the estimated 3,000 jobs they provide. However, she encouraged the sides to reach a compromise, and Robson said Brewer aides participated in at least part of the talks.

Robson says wording of the legislation to implement the compromise is now being prepared. He says efforts are under way to identify a bill that can be expanded or replaced to include the compromise.

The vetoed bill would have legalized the billboards but allowed local governments to have local laws restricting the nighttime light displays in order to protect dark skies needed by observatories.

Jeff Hall, director of the Lowell Observatory in Flagstaff, confirmed that legislation to implement the results of the talks is being drafted. However, he declined to discuss the provisions pending agreement on the detailed language.

However, another observatory official said elements of the compromise outlined by Robson meets the concerns that observatories had in trying to negotiate a compromise with billboard industry representatives.

“That all sounds and resonates well,” said the other official, Paul Shankland of the U.S. Naval Observatory in Flagstaff.

Johnson said the compromise allows placement of new electronic billboards in the permitted zone. But the new ones would still be subject to local controls that could be more restrictive than those imposed by the state, Johnson said.

Also, the legislation would take effect immediately if approved by the Legislature and the governor, to head off any rush to erect additional signs outside the permitted zone, he said. “It was a good-faith effort on our part that we weren’t trying to pull a fast one.”

Normal bills do not take effect until 90 days after the end of the legislative session.

Article source: http://www.businessweek.com/ap/2012-04/D9U7DDF81.htm

Tags: , , <BR/>

Astronomers, advertisers ink billboards deal

PHOENIX — Central and Western Arizona will be wide open for illuminated billboards with changing messages under the terms of a deal hammered out Tuesday between sign owners and the astronomy community.

A proposal awaiting the finishing touches would create what amounts to buffer zones around the state’s existing and possible observatories where no new signs of this type would be allowed. In essence, it protects all of Arizona north of New River, making the entire northern tier of the state a “dark sky” zone for the brightly lit internally lighted signs.

Also off limits would be areas east of the Phoenix metro area, with protections extending to Cochise and Pima counties.

What’s left, however, are long stretches of I-10 and I-8 from Gila Bend and Phoenix and all the way to the California border.

Most immediately, that leaves in place the 70 existing signs, virtually all of which are outside the protected zones. The one exception is a billboard near Picacho Peak that will be “grandfathered” and allowed to remain.

The deal also includes a requirement for the billboards that remain — and those yet to come — to be turned off at 11 p.m. And there are some limits on the level of illumination, though they are brighter than the astronomy community had sought.

Jeff Hall, director of the Lowell Observatory, said he and his colleagues had hoped for more.

He said astronomers had hoped for a 90-mile zone around each site as the best way to minimize light pollution. Billboard operators wanted far less, with the 75 miles in the final plan the “absolute floor” that he and his colleagues could accept.

Hall said it became clear that industry would not give up their right to have more signs in the Phoenix metro area, where most of the existing billboards are located.

“The principal goal of the observatories was simply to preserve the rural parts of the state where the observatories are located. Completely overturning this thing was not an option from the start.”

That was also the assessment of Rep. Bob Robson, R-Chandler, who had proposed legislation to clarify that this type of signs was legal after the state Court of Appeals ruled otherwise last year. When that plan was vetoed by Gov. Jan Brewer, Robson sought to hammer out a compromise.

Robson said any effort to try to tear down the existing 70 signs made no financial sense.

He cited an Arizona constitutional provision which requires the government to pay when it takes private property. Robson said he could foresee billboard owners, who erected their signs with state permits, claiming financial losses of $10 million apiece, meaning a potential $700 million hit to the state budget.

While the astronomy community appears satisfied, that’s not the case across the board.

Mark Mayer of Scenic Arizona, which has fought the internally illuminated billboards in court and won, said he was not part of any negotiations. Nor had he even seen any draft of a deal.

Mayer said he wants assurances that there are no loopholes in the measure that would allow companies to erect more signs in the protected zones before the legislation takes effect.

He also said that, astronomy issues aside, there should be a limit on how close these type of signs can be to each other. Mayer suggested no more than one every 1,000 feet.

But the deal leaves in place existing regulations that govern all types of billboards, no matter their lighting source. Tim Tait of the Arizona Department of Transportation, said that means 500 feet spacing along freeways, with signs allowed as close to 100 feet from each other along other state roads in incorporated areas.

Article source: http://www.yumasun.com/news/signs-78354-state-billboards.html

Tags: , , , <BR/>

Brewer’s 1st veto of year rejects electronic billboards

Gov. Jan Brewer used her veto pen Wednesday to shield Arizona’s astronomy industry from the glow of electronic billboards, rejecting a bill that would have legalized the digital boards.


Brewer’s letter on veto


It was her first veto of the year and underscored her commitment to what she called “Arizona’s unique position as a national leader in astronomy and stargazing.”

House Bill 2757 would have brought 70 electronic billboards into compliance with the state’s Highway Beautification Act. A state appeals court last year ruled the boards, with their constantly changing messages, violated the state’s ban on intermittent light.

The astronomy industry, led by representatives of the state’s largest observatories, argued the bill could ruin the dark skies that have made Arizona a prime site for astronomical research.

Jeff Hall, director of the Lowell Observatory in Flagstaff, said Brewer’s veto will prevent, at least for now, a proliferation of electronic billboards. More importantly, he said, it’s an important economic signal.

“It sends a message from the executive office that Arizona is committed to the industry and the potential $300 million investment it brings,” he said.

Arizona is competing with five countries for the $130 million Cherenkov Telescope Array near Flagstaff. An additional $170 million is tied up in three other projects coming to Arizona, Hall said.

In her veto letter, Brewer offered hope to billboard representatives, saying she has won assurances from Rep. Bob Robson, R-Chandler and the bill’s sponsor, to work on a compromise.

Robson late Wednesday said he was unclear what would be workable.

“I don’t know how much work can be done if the observatories want a 75-mile radius,” he said, referring to their demand for a buffer zone around telescope sites.

“I’m scratching my head as to what to do. … It comes down to people not really wanting to have (electronic) billboards.”

But Wendy Briggs, who represents Clear Channel Communications, which owns some of the 70 billboards in question, said her client will take Brewer up on her offer to compromise.

This entry was posted
on Wednesday, March 28th, 2012 at 9:37 pm and is filed under Arizona Republic News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Article source: http://tucsoncitizen.com/arizona-news/2012/03/28/brewers-1st-veto-of-year-rejects-electronic-billboards/

Tags: , , , <BR/>

Senate approves electronic billboard bill

PHOENIX (WTW) — Astronomers and billboard companies are at odds over legislation that would lift a state ban on electronic billboards and put them under local government control.

Billboard companies are asking the Legislature to change the law after a recent decision by the Arizona Court of Appeals that bans electronic billboards along freeways. The Arizona Senate approved the bill on a 20-8 vote Wednesday. It now goes to Gov. Jan Brewer.

Professional astronomers argue that billboards threaten the dark skies needed for their work, which they said brings a major economic benefit to Arizona.

The legislation was introduced after a November 2011 ruling by the Arizona Court of Appeals that found the electronic billboards violate a state law concerning outdoor advertising along interstates and highways. The ruling threatened about 70 existing billboards.

Rep. Bob Robson, R-Chandler, sponsored the measure, claiming it is needed to recognize the changing technology in the outdoor advertising industry and ensure that the existing billboards are permitted. Robson said 40 other states have adopted similar laws related to electronic billboards.

“I’m not trying to put an industry out of business,” Robson said about the astronomers’ concerns, but he added that the billboard industry is also important to the state. Robson said the dark skies needed by the astronomy community will still be protected with by city and county regulations.

Electronic billboards are also “critical tools,” for the state because they can quickly display Amber Alerts to passing motorists, said Robert Johnson, a spokesman for CBS Outdoor, one of the major billboard companies in the state.

Johnson said the legislation will not impede the ability of professional astronomers to view the night sky. He said the observatories are trying to use the court ruling as an opening to push for a ban on the billboards.

“I don’t think that anyone would believe that those 70 boards are putting an end to astronomy as we know it,” he said.

There are no electronic billboards near the observatories, and there never will be because local rules wouldn’t allow them, said Wendy Briggs, a lobbyist who represents Clear Channel Outdoor Inc., another major billboard company.

“There are plenty of current protections in the local laws for the observatories,” she said.

Local restrictions are very helpful, but light pollution beyond those areas is already a problem for astronomers, said Paul Shankland, director of U.S. Naval Observatory at Flagstaff. Shankland said no one billboard or traffic light causes a problem, but astronomers have to be proactive because encroachment on their ability to see the sky “is often death by a thousand cuts,” he said.

Shankland said dark skies are critical to his agency, which is tasked with, among other objectives, watching out for objects orbiting Earth that could threaten satellites and other equipment.

“They could easily destroy things as big as the International Space Station,” he said. “If we can’t see them, then we’ve got a problem. If there’s light pollution in the night sky, then it makes it very difficult.”

Democrats unsuccessfully fought to add a provision to the bill that bars the billboards within 75 miles of an observatory. Sen. Leah Landrum Taylor, a Phoenix Democrat, called the 75-mile ban “very reasonable,” and ensures the astronomers’ work is not disrupted. The changes would also protect the jobs of 3,000 people who work in the industry, she said.

Sen. John McComish, an Ahwatukee Republican, said that a 75-mile restriction would effectively be a statewide ban on all electronic billboards.

Shankland, with the Naval Observatory, said he feels 75 miles is “modest,” and he’s concerned about the impact the bill will have. The astronomy industry is becoming a very important part of the nation’s technological power, and Arizona is one of the last “astronomy-friendly states,” he said.

“It is very difficult to find that niche anymore in this country,” he said.

Copyright 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Article source: http://www.thenorthwestern.com/usatoday/article/38858853?odyssey=mod%7Cnewswell%7Ctext%7CFRONTPAGE%7Cs

Tags: , , , <BR/>

State panel OKs digital billboards

PHOENIX — Lobbied by the billboard industry, a House panel
voted Tuesday to allow dozens of internally illuminated billboards
along state highways to stay and allow future ones to be
erected.

HB2757 seeks to overturn last year’s ruling by the state Court
of Appeals, which concluded that state law does not authorize the
signs with their changeable messages. Rep. Bob Robson, R-Chandler,
who is sponsoring the measure, said all it does is restore the law
to what he said everyone assumed it had been.

But Mark Mayer, who represents Scenic Arizona, said that’s not
true, which is why he said the lawsuit was filed in the first
place. And a series of representatives from the astronomy industry
argued that allowing these signs to remain — and proliferate –
would undermine the $1.2 billion investment in the state and the
$250 million it generates in grants and funds from out of
state.

Robson responded that cities and counties remain free to impose
their own restrictions on these type of signs or ban them outright.
That was enough to convince a majority of the Government Committee
to approve the legislation, sending the bill to the full House.

Wendy Briggs, lobbyist for Clear Channel Communications, told
lawmakers the appellate court got it wrong in concluding that the
1958 federal Highway Beautification Act and its state counterpart
approved a dozen years later prohibit digital billboards along
roads funded at least in part with federal and state dollars. And
Briggs said her company and others who have erected the 70
illuminated signs, mostly in Maricopa and Pinal counties, followed
all the proper procedures, including getting permits from
applicable government authorities.

Briggs also said there are inherent benefits to these changeable
signs, including the ability to tell passing motorists about people
wanted for kidnapping and other crimes.

Gene Gardner, a project administrator for the Smithsonian
Institute working at the Whipple Observatory in southern Arizona
told lawmakers they need to consider the fallout from these
signs.

Gardner said work is under way to land funding for the next
generation of gamma ray astronomy, a $130 million project with a
$10 million annual operating budget.

“Unfortunately, with some legislation like this, it’s just
enough to scare away astronomers,” he said, calling the digital
billboards “a killer for astronomy.” And Gardner said there is
tremendous competition for grants, with Arizona already having lost
projects to Utah and Colorado.

Elizabeth Alvarez, assistant to the director at Kitt Peak
National Observatory, said part of what makes the billboards so
problematic is that the light is emitted horizontally. She said
that creates all sorts of problems for astronomers who rely on dark
skies.

Briggs, however, said these signs emit less light pollution than
traditional billboards which are illuminated from below, shining
their lights upwards, which is the practice in much of the
industry. She also said that these signs are turned off nightly at
11 p.m.

“Most astronomy is done in the middle of the night,” she
said.

Rep. David Gowan, R-Sierra Vista, said he sees no need for a
statewide ban as long as the legislation does not preempt local
rules.

“Now we can go to the local level to make sure the rural
regions, if need be, are taken care of for the rights of the
astronomers,” he said.

But Rep. Eric Meyer, D-Paradise Valley, said that ignores how
far light pollution can spread. Meyer also said that, given the
expense of operating a telescope, telling astronomers they are free
to work after midnight does not help.

Further changes in the measure may come before the next
step.

Rep. Steve Urie, R-Gilbert, voted for the measure but said he
wants it amended to include some limits on illumination.

Article source: http://azdailysun.com/news/local/state-and-regional/state-panel-oks-digital-billboards/article_c851080d-d835-5949-8c77-293177b0d889.html

Tags: , , , , , <BR/>