Archive for earth microbes

Bacteria from Siberia capable of living on Mars – study

A group of American-Russian scientists have found several types of bacteria from Siberian permafrost, which can grow in harsh conditions similar to those on Mars. It could potentially mean that Earth microbes can survive on the Red Planet.

Some of the genus Carnobacterium microbes have already been found to exist in cold climates around the world – such as Alaska and in the oxygen-poor waters of Ace Lake in Antarctica.

Researchers from the Department of Microbiology Cell Science at the University of Florida took samples of bacteria from the sand deposits, on the bank of the Kolyma River in northeastern Siberia.

After extracting the samples from a depth of 12-20 meters where the soil has an average annual temperature of -7 °C, scientists grew bacterial colonies at 28 °C in normal atmospheric conditions.

The bacteria were then tested in Martian conditions – exposed to a lack of oxygen, extremely negative temperatures, and very low pressure – which hinder the growth of most terrestrial microorganisms.

After the 30-day experiment, only six of the 10,000 isolates were able to grow under these conditions.

All of the surviving isolates were members of the genus Carnobacterium- as reported by the scientific quartet of Wayne L. Nicholson, Kirill Krivushin, David Gilichinsky and Andrew C. Schuerger , in the journal “Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.”

Scientists say these results are important to assess the possibility of life on Mars.

However, a Russian-American group of physicists recently highlighted a barrier to microbes surviving on Mars.At the 43rd Lunar and Planetary Science Conference in Texas, they found radiation levels on the surface of the Red Planet is so high, that at a depth of around 10 centimeters the existence of organic matter is believed to be impossible.

Article source: http://rt.com/news/mars-bacteria-life-research-822/

Tags: , , , , , , <BR/>

Did Mars and Earth swap spit during their formative years?

Comment

Email Print

Starfleet’s prime directive is straightforward: there can be no interference with the internal development of alien civilizations.

And although Starfleet is a fictional organization in the Star Trek universe, this is a principle NASA is nonetheless trying to uphold. That’s why they’re hoping the Curiosity rover does not find water in Gale Crater, the LA Times reports:

Scientists don’t believe they will. They chose the cold, dry equatorial landing site in Mars’ Gale Crater for its geology, not its prospects for harboring water or ice, which exist elsewhere on the planet.

But if by chance the rover Curiosity does find H2O, a controversy that has simmered at NASA for nearly a year will burst into the open. Curiosity’s drill bits may be contaminated with Earth microbes. If they are, and if those bits touch water, the organisms could survive.

The possible contamination of the drill bits occurred six months before the rover’s launch last Nov. 26. The bits had been sterilized inside a box to be opened only after Curiosity landed on Mars.

If the rover does find water, it will be commanded to turn around.

Curiosity will obey the prime directive. (NASA)

The notion that life may survive the transit from Earth to Mars and survive on the red planet may sound ridiculous, but scientists have discovered that it is, indeed, possible. In 2009 scientists simulated Mars conditions found that bacteria such as E. coli could survive both the spacecraft sterilization process on Earth and hostile conditions on Mars. (see study abstract from the Journal of Applied and Environmental Microbiology).

Whether the bacteria could actually reproduce on the red planet was an unanswered question.

Another question is whether scientists will be able to determine the difference between life on Earth and Mars — and where life originated. That’s because some researchers believe life on Earth originated on Mars, and that life from there was carried to Earth by meteorites.

Say what?

In the early days of the solar system there were chunks of planets flying all over the solar system. Studies suggest that as much as 5 to 10 percent of rocks blasted off the surface of Mars would reach the Earth, being a nearby gravitational body, and scientists have found Martian meteorites on Earth. As estimated 1 ton of rocks have traveled from Mars to Earth.

During this early epoch scientists also understand that the climates of Earth and Mars were similar, so if life could have evolved on Earth, it could have done so on Mars as well.

The bottom line is that NASA is doing well to respect the fictional prime directive, and in doing so we should eventually find the origins of life in our solar system.

Article source: http://blog.chron.com/sciguy/2012/09/did-mars-and-earth-swap-spit-during-their-formative-years/

Tags: , , , , <BR/>

Life On Mars, What If We Brought It There?

Facebook Twitter Reddit Stumbleupon Plusone Linkedin Tumblr Pinterest Posterous Digg Snailmail Email

20120902-122118.jpg

NASA’s roving Mars Science Laboratory, Curiosity, has begun its journey to look for the evidence of life, past and present, on Mars.

If we found life though, how would we know that we didn’t put it there?

“To date, a total of a dozen U.S., Soviet, and European spacecraft have landed or crashed on Mars. They were all sterilized before leaving Earth, but were the procedures good enough to wipe out every last stowaway Earth bug?”

20120902-122135.jpg
“If we were to determine Mars has been biocontaminated by microscopic colonists from Earth, it would open a Pandora’s box of astrobiological issues. Did we “play God” by inadvertently seeding another world with life that mutated into a new type of organism that adapted to alien conditions?”

“There is reason to worry about biocontamation. In 2006 it was reported that a common soil bacterium, called Bacillus, remained healthy and viable on a spacecraft that had been sterilized with ultraviolet light.”

“Perversely, sending microbes to Mars could become one of the greatest accidental science experiments of all time: the introduction of an organism on another planet that tests the power of Darwinian evolution, and offers a window into Earth’s early history.”

“We have known from the rock record that complex life is amazingly resilient. Despite repeated near annihilation, complex life has never failed to adapt to new environments. We believe that once life got started on this planet, it survived one way or another,” writes Janet Siefert of Rice University in Astrobiology.

“The author argues that based on the fossil record it seems inevitable that microbes will eke out a living by beating all odds to accumulate the right genetic material to adapt quickly. But can they pull it off on a dry, irradiated, and hostile place like Mars?”

20120902-122231.jpg
“A lab experiment in 2012 subjected microorganisms to Mars-like conditions. The bugs had a rough time coping with a daily thawing and freezing cycle, lack of oxygen, and sparse water. It slowed down their growth and the microbes ultimately perished.”

“On the other hand say the researchers, even if a small fraction of the stowaways survive on Mars, it’s possible that they could rapidly ‘play the numbers,’ perhaps like their early Earth ancestors. Relying on quickly trying out a plethora of genetic mutations the bugs might come up with a new survival strategy in short order.”

“The makeover could be so extreme that it would really be a Genesis II, the origin of a new form of life on another world, say the researchers.”

This line of reasoning has some serious flaws though, if you follow it, it “leads inevitably to the conclusion that Mars must already be inhabited with native organisms that arose at the same time life appeared on Earth, and were genetically agile at adapting to a dying Red Planet.”

“Therefore, stranded Earth microbes might compete with Mars microbes for resources. We’d introduce a shadow biosphere on the Red Planet; where completely different form of life co-exists.”

If we did contaminate Mars with organisms from Earth, it “might not be an experiment we ethically want to conduct, but it would be an unparalleled experimental result.”

Source: Discovery and Wikipedia

Image Credits: NASA; ESA; Green and E.Coli via Wikimedia Commons


Interested in free solar estimates for your home?

Facebook Twitter Reddit Stumbleupon Plusone Linkedin Tumblr Pinterest Posterous Digg Snailmail Email

Article source: http://planetsave.com/2012/09/02/life-on-mars-what-if-we-brought-it-there/

Tags: , , <BR/>

Have We Already Colonized Mars?

EscherichiaColi_NIAID

Addressing the insatiable curiosity of its builders, NASA’s roving Mars Science Laboratory has taken its first small “roll for mankind” in search of unraveling the clues to the habitability of Mars, past and present.

However, there is a small chance that Martian evolutionary history may be confused by the presence of hitchhiking microbes from Earth.

garbage
WATCH VIDEO: Will the real ET be little green men or little green bacteria?

ANALYSIS: Could New Rover’s Wheels Deliver Germs to Mars?

To date, a total of a dozen U.S., Soviet, and European spacecraft have landed or crashed on Mars. They were all sterilized before leaving Earth, but were the procedures good enough to wipe out every last stowaway Earth bug?

If we were to determine Mars has been biocontaminated by microscopic colonists from Earth, it would open a Pandora’s box of astrobiological issues. Did we “play God” by inadvertently seeding another world with life that mutated into a new type of organism that adapted to alien conditions?

There is reason to worry about biocontamation. In 2006 it was reported that a common soil bacterium, called Bacillus, remained healthy and viable on a spacecraft that had been sterilized with ultraviolet light.

Perversely, sending microbes to Mars could become one of the greatest accidental science experiments of all time: the introduction of an organism on another planet that tests the power of Darwinian evolution, and offers a window into Earth’s early history.

ANALYSIS: Homemade ‘Mars in a Bottle’ Tortures Bacteria

“We have known from the rock record that complex life is amazingly resilient. Despite repeated near annihilation, complex life has never failed to adapt to new environments. We believe that once life got started on this planet, it survived one way or another,” writes Janet Siefert of Rice University in Astrobiology.

The author argues that based on the fossil record it seems inevitable that microbes will eke out a living by beating all odds to accumulate the right genetic material to adapt quickly. But can they pull it off on a dry, irradiated, and hostile place like Mars?

A lab experiment in 2012 subjected microorganisms to Mars-like conditions. The bugs had a rough time coping with a daily thawing and freezing cycle, lack of oxygen, and sparse water. It slowed down their growth and the microbes ultimately perished.

Beagle30879

On the other hand say the researchers, even if a small fraction of the stowaways survive on Mars, it’s possible that they could rapidly “play the numbers,” perhaps like their early Earth ancestors. Relying on quickly trying out a plethora of genetic mutations the bugs might come up with a new survival strategy in short order.

ANALYSIS: Are We Infecting Mars With Our Germs?

The makeover could be so extreme that it would really be a Genesis II, the origin of a new form of life on another world, say the researchers.

Ironically, I’d say that this line of reasoning leads inevitably to the conclusion that Mars must already be inhabited with native organisms that arose at the same time life appeared on Earth, and were genetically agile at adapting to a dying Red Planet.

Therefore, stranded Earth microbes might compete with Mars microbes for resources. We’d introduce a shadow biosphere on the Red Planet; where completely different form of life co-exists.

Contaminating Mars with Earth organisms, “might not be an experiment we ethically want to conduct, but it would be an unparalleled experimental result,” the authors conclude.

Images: Top: E. coli, a hardy bacteria. But is it a potential Mars colonist? Middle: The British Beagle 2 lander that was built to specifically hunt down Mars life. Sadly, it failed. Credit: NASA, ESA




Article source: http://news.discovery.com/space/we-may-have-already-colonized-mars-120831.html

Tags: , , <BR/>

Rover’s risk of contaminating Mars studied

This artist concept features NASA's Mars Science Laboratory Curiosity rover, a mobile robot for investigating Mars' past or present ability to sustain microbial life. Curiosity is being tested in preparation for launch in the fall of 2011. Earth microbes trying to make it to Mars must survive sterilization in NASA’s clean rooms, harsh cosmic rays during months of space travel and the Red Planet’s unforgiving surface environment.

Email this Article
Add to Newsvine


Tags: , , , , <BR/>

Microbe Risk When Rover Wheels Hit Martian Dirt


Earth microbes trying to make it to Mars must survive sterilization in NASA’s clean rooms, harsh cosmic rays during months of space travel, and the Red Planet’s unforgiving surface environment. But any bacteria that successfully hitchhike aboard the wheels of NASA’s Mars Science Laboratory mission in 2012 might manage to scratch out a brief existence on the martian surface.

The finding comes from a study that examined how the new high-tech landing technique of the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) may affect the risk of contaminating Mars. The mission will use both a parachute and downward-firing thruster rockets to slow its descent so that its “sky crane” can lower the SUV-sized Curiosity rover onto the surface — a direct touchdown that may give microbes a brief chance to experience life on Mars.
That translates into a higher risk of contamination when compared to some past Mars rover missions, said Andrew C. Schuerger, a microbiologist at the University of Florida and the Space Life Sciences Lab at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida. But he added that microbes still face tough odds for surviving space travel and martian conditions.

“Although this paper suggests we could be transferring bacteria to martian surface, we don’t know for certain yet,” Schuerger said. “We could very well be losing most due to the exposure to vacuum in space, cosmic rays and hard radiation. Even if cells are present on a rover wheel at launch, they might be dead by the time they get to Mars.”

Standing still

Schuerger and his colleague, Krystal Kerney, wanted to find out whether the wheels of Mars rovers past and future could contaminate the martian surface. They ran two experiments simulating the contamination possibilities for MSL versus the Mars Pathfinder mission of 1997 and the Mars Exploration Rovers (MER) that landed on the red planet in 2004.

The Mars Pathfinder rover, called Sojourner, sat on a landing platform for 2 martian days before rolling onto the surface. The twin MER rovers, Spirit and Opportunity, sat on their landing platforms for 12 and 7 martian days, respectively. Each martian day is just a little over 24 hours.

In the recent study, researchers simulated a Mars rover sitting on a landing platform for 1, 3 and 6 hours while being exposed to martian levels of ultraviolet (UV) rays. Even such short amounts of time killed between 81 percent and 96.6 percent of the Bacillus subtilis bacteria used in the experiment.

“We did very short UV exposures, and even there we see 96 percent [of bacteria killed] over 6 hours,” Schuerger told Astrobiology Magazine. “That’s a very dramatic and a very positive sign that a rover wheel which sits on a platform, like MER did, has a much better chance of being sterilized prior to roll-off than a direct to ground system.”

The number of survivors would likely have dropped to practically zero if the experiment had run for 7 or 12 days, Schuerger said.

Rolling in the dirt

By contrast, the second experiment simulated how a rover wheel in the future MSL mission would immediately come into contact with the martian surface. When the contaminated rover wheel rolled over the simulated surface, about 31.7 percent of the surface samples ended up showing bacterial growth.

But the contamination level dropped by 50 percent after 24 hours of exposure to simulated Mars conditions, such as UV radiation, low pressure, low temperature and high levels of carbon dioxide. The results pointed once again to the harshness of the martian surface environment for Earth life.

The second experiment doesn’t say anything definitive about the real risk of contamination, Schuerger warned. For instance, it didn’t test whether having multiple wheels rolling over the same surface area could bury microbes from the first wheel beneath the martian surface. It also didn’t simulate the weight of the SUV-sized Curiosity rover that could mash even more microbes into the ground.

On the other hand, the researchers contaminated the rover wheels with perhaps 100,000 times more bacteria compared to what would realistically exist during any of the Mars rover missions. Some Mars rovers get sterilized three or four times, Schuerger said. He added that the journey through space may kill 75 percent of whatever survived after launch.

The next test

What the experiments do suggest is that just having the Curiosity rover sit still for a number of days could help kill off much of the bacteria clinging to its wheels. But the researchers still have questions to answer.
“We need to repeat these experiments with much longer time exposures to martian conditions to see if we can get to a rover wheel completely sterilized sitting on a landing pad,” Schuerger explained. “We also need to see if 7 or 8 martian days would essentially get to zero amount of survivors, even if we accidentally transferred bacterial spores to the surface.”

Such contamination experiments could be done more easily once humans establish a Mars colony and can work alongside their robotic rovers, Schuerger said. But for now, he will have to make do with small Mars simulation chambers on Earth.

The study was detailed in the June 2011 issue of journal Astrobiology.

Article source: http://www.astrobio.net/index.php?option=com_exclusive&task=detail&id=4196

Tags: , , , <BR/>