Archive for jeff foust

Will NASA ever articulate a mission for human spaceflight?

In a thoughtful piece at the Space Review, Jeff Foust delves into the issue of the vision thing, which NASA’s human spaceflight program seems to continue to lack.

Foust starts his article with comments from Steve Squyres, the Cornell University planetary scientist who is the principal investigator of NASA’s Mars Exploration Rovers  and chairman of the NASA Advisory Council.

Artist’s concept of SLS. (NASA)

Squyres said he is not so much concerned about the viability of the Space Launch System, but rather its lack of a plan to develop the hardware needed to go along with the rocket or spacecraft. Like a rover for the Moon. Or life-support systems for going to an asteroid.

And that’s one the of the dirty secrets of NASA’s current plan to launch a new rocket by 2021 or so: Under the current budget conditions — let alone a cut — there’s absolutely no money for actually building payloads, stuff to fly that will allow the space agency to go meaningful places and do meaningful things.

For Squyres, however, there’s a deeper, related problem: No clear mission-success statement. “It is harder than we would like it to be to clearly articulate to our stakeholders and to our workforce what the agency is trying to achieve. In the absence of that, it makes it harder to get the job done,” he said.

NASA has said its long-term goal is Mars, and President Obama has said he would like the space program to send humans to an asteroid in the interim. But there are no budgets or timelines for either of these missions.

Later in the article Foust notes that NASA is indeed working on a “180-day report” directed by Congress in the agency’s 2012 appropriations bill to further refine its exploration plans, including a discussion of specific destinations.

Beyond that some hope that an upcoming study, likened as a decadal study for human exploration, will provide recommendations for spaceflight goals during the period 2014 through 2023. The study is due in August 2014.

That in and of itself presents a problem, beyond just having to wait two-plus more years for a long-range vision.

By the summer of 2014, if re-elected, President Obama will have just over two years left in office and probably be disinclined to change the space program’s direction. Or if a Republican wins the White House, chances are he will have put his own stamp on the space program already, and the survey probably won’t have much effect.

Article source: http://blog.chron.com/sciguy/2012/04/will-nasa-ever-articulate-a-mission-for-human-spaceflight/

Tags: , , <BR/>

NASA a hot topic among frontrunners – The News

<!–Saxotech Paragraph Count: 12
–>

The agency’s other priority is the James Webb Space Telescope, a vastly overbudget successor to the Hubble Space Telescope that the House threatened to kill this year.

Before and during the presidential campaign, Gingrich, whom the media once dubbed “Newt Skywalker,” has been the most outspoken among GOP contenders on space issues.

Now, it is his views that might strike voters as either bold or controversial.

“His policy would represent a pretty sharp change from the current policy,” said Jeff Foust, an industry analyst and author of the Space Politics blog. “He would represent probably the biggest change from the status quo of any of the campaigns.”

That change might include a stronger emphasis on commercial space activity and competitions to spur innovation, attempts to restructure NASA, and potentially to revise or even eliminate major programs.

On the campaign trail, Gingrich has called NASA an innovation—stifling bureaucracy where employees only “think space.”

The banter

Republican front-runner Mitt Romney has seized on Gringrich’s interest in a colony to mine minerals from the moon as a wasteful idea that raises broader questions about his fitness to lead.

Shuttle retirement

No other leading Republicans have addressed space issues substantively, and none has released detailed space policies, leaving voters to interpret such exchanges for hints about candidates’ leanings.

The decision to retire the shuttle was made in 2004 under President George W. Bush for safety and cost reasons. NASA couldn’t afford to fly it and simultaneously develop new vehicles needed to reach the moon or beyond.

Whether candidates present bold space visions or simply preferences for speeding development of commercial or government rockets, their options might be limited once in office.

Congress in 2010 approved a new direction for NASA after bruising debate, and the agency faces flat or lower budgets for years as the federal government tightens its belt.

Leaders on Florida’s Space Coast have invited Republican candidates to briefings this month to discuss space issues, which they believe campaigns must take seriously. Though a niche issue nationally, space resonates along the Interstate 4 high-tech corridor in Central Florida, considered critical to winning the state, and perhaps, even the general election.

Article source: http://www.news-press.com/article/20120106/NEWS0107/301060029/NASA-hot-topic-among-frontrunners?odyssey=tab%7Ctopnews%7Ctext%7CHome

Tags: , , , , , , <BR/>

Recommended: Rapture humor resurrected

Today’s countdown to the predicted end of the world was a bit like watching a rerun of reality TV … been there, done that doomsday. Nevertheless, radio preacher Harold Camping’s Rapture rerun provided a good opportunity to revive the old jokes and prepare for the new doomsday hype ahead in 2012.

The hype was a lot heavier five months ago, when Camping set a high-profile date for a biblical-style ascension of the elect to heaven. Millions of dollars were spent by Camping’s Family Radio International as well as followers who spent their savings to get out the word about the end of the world. During this week’s spaceflight conference in New Mexico, one of my colleagues on the space beat, Jeff Foust, happened to mention that he saw a billboard that still touted Judgment Day’s approach on May 21.

The hubbub sparked a backlash of black humor — ranging from animated cartoons to “Rapture bombs,” which involved setting out clothes and shoes, as if the wearer had been transported (nude) to the pearly gates. The Sociolatte and Mashable websites revived some of the best of the bombs, including “Rapture Dad,” a photo that shows Kyle Riesenbeck surrounded by the leavings of his luckier family members. (Kyle kept the meme going, but according to his Twitter account, Rapture Dad has “decided to take it easy on the Rapture this time around.”)


That’s just one of the signs that the Rapture has really run its course. Camping may well come up with yet another explanation for why prophecy failed, and yet another set of arcane calculations that reveal doomsday is just a little further down the road. But based on the weak ratings for today’s Rapture rerun, the 90-year-old Camping is finished as a prophet of doom. The Freedom From Religion Foundation is even capitalizing on his past pronouncements in a new “Fool Me Once” billboard campaign.

Still more evidence of Rapture fatigue comes from a Crimson Hexagon analysis of 55,537 Twitter mentions related to Camping’s October prophecy, gathered from Oct. 16 to today:

  • 14 percent of the mentions expressed negativity toward Camping, many indicating they thought he was crazy or an idiot.
  • 26 percent shared jokes or were sarcastic about the rapture and Camping’s predictions.
  • 18 percent mentioned that Camping was at it again, and dubbed this prediction as Rapture 2.0 or Rapture2s.
  • 13 percent expressed excitement for the end of the world and saw it as an excuse to throw a party.
  • 14 percent shared the report that todaywas the predicted date of the Rapture.
  • 8 percent voiced a religious response, such as saying Camping was a false prophet.
  • 7 percent wondered whether the Rapture was for real this time.

For years, doomsayers have been talking about the prospects for a 2012 apocalypse foretold by the Mayan “long-count” calendar, even though there’s really no scientific or even anthropological basis for the alarm. I’ve tried to provide some reality checks for the 2012 worries — including concerns about solar storms and the supposed return of Planet X. But today’s non-Rapture may be an even more valuable lesson for anyone who’s concerned about 12/21/2012: Just because someone makes a big to-do about the end of the world doesn’t mean that it’s coming.

So what do you think about the Rapture and other doomsdays? Heard any good end-of-the-world jokes lately? Feel free to add your comments below.


Review all of the postings from Rapture 1.0 by checking CosmicLog.com/Rapture. You can also connect with the Cosmic Log community by “liking” the log’s Facebook page, following @b0yle on Twitter or adding me to a circle on Google+. And for something completely different, check out “The Case for Pluto,” my book about the controversial dwarf planet and the search for new worlds.

Article source: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/10/21/8434346-rapture-humor-resurrected

Tags: , , , <BR/>