Archive for nobel prize in physics

National Radio Astronomy Observatory

Discoveries Suggest Icy Cosmic Start for Amino Acids and DNA Ingredients

Using new technology at the telescope and in laboratories, researchers have discovered an important pair of prebiotic molecules in interstellar space. The discoveries indicate that some basic chemicals that are key steps on the way to life may have…
2/28/2013 11:30 AM EST

Newly Discovered Clouds Found Floating High above Milky Way

New studies with the National Science Foundation’s Robert C. Byrd Green Bank Telescope (GBT) have revealed a previously unknown population of discrete hydrogen clouds in the gaseous halo that surrounds the Milky Way Galaxy.
10/19/2002 12:00 AM EDT

Associated Universities, Inc. President Wins 2002 Nobel Prize for Physics

The Nobel Prize in Physics has just been awarded to Riccardo Giacconi, President of Associated Universities, Inc., and Research Professor at Johns Hopkins University, “for pioneering contributions to astrophysics, which have led to the discovery of…
10/9/2002 12:00 AM EDT

Article source: http://www.newswise.com/institutions/newsroom/3889/

Tags: , , , , <BR/>

Gruber Cosmology Prize 2012 awarded to Charles Bennett and the …

June 20th, 2012





Gruber Cosmology Prize 2012 awarded to Charles Bennett and the WMAP Team
Enlarge

This is Charles L. Bennett, Alumni Centennial Professor of Physics and Astronomy at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore. Bennett and the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe team are the recipients of the 2012 Gruber Cosmology Prize. Their observations and analyses of ancient light have provided the unprecedentedly rigorous measurements of the age, content, geometry, and origin of the Universe that now comprise the Standard Cosmological Model. Credit: International Astronomical Union

The 2012 Gruber Cosmology Prize recognises the astronomers for their vital contribution to the study of the properties of the Universe as a whole. The prize citation further recognises that the measurements of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) by Bennett and the WMAP team have helped to transform the current paradigm of the structure formation of the Universe from “appealing scenario into precise science”.

Bennett and the WMAP team will receive the US$ 500 000 award. In addition, Bennett will receive a gold medal at the International Astronomical Union meeting in Beijing, which will take place on 21 August 2012.

The Big Bang theory is the prevailing cosmological model that explains the early development and overall properties of the Universe. According to the Big Bang theory, the Universe rapidly expanded from an early, extremely hot and dense plasma of photons, electrons, and protons. This primordial plasma was an opaque fog. As the Universe expanded, it also cooled. Only 378 000 years after the initial expansion, the Universe cooled sufficiently to permit the combination of protons and electrons to form neutral hydrogen atoms. This led to the decoupling of photons, which then could travel freely through the Universe without interacting with matter. The Universe was finally transparent to radiation.

In 1948, Ralph Alpher, Robert Herman, and George Gamow — among other important results — predicted that the Universe should be filled with this relic radiation from the Big Bang – the CMB radiation. In 1964, two American radio astronomers — Penzias and Wilson — observed the CMB, receiving the 1978 Nobel Prize in Physics for their discovery.

Precise measurements of CMB radiation are critical to cosmology, since any proposed model of the Universe must explain the detailed properties of this radiation. Because everything that is in the Universe now would have to have been there when the Universe was 378 000 years old, some extraordinarily subtle fluctuations in the microwave background would have to have been present — variations that would represent the seeds that would evolve into the galaxies, clusters of galaxies, and superclusters of galaxies that populate the Universe as we know it.

Seminal work on this topic was performed by the earlier Cosmic Background Explorer (COBE), a satellite telescope. In 1992, the COBE team announced the discovery of those relic wrinkles in space, achieving a major milestone in modern cosmology. However, only follow-up observations at greater sensitivity and resolution, would allow scientists to pin down the fundamental cosmology of the Universe.

Bennett — the deputy principal investigator of the COBE experiment — soon became the principal investigator of the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP). WMAP is a spacecraft launched in 2001 aimed to measure differences in the temperature of the CMB radiation across the full sky. The WMAP’s findings have been so precise that they are now commonly known as the Standard Cosmological Model.

“Dr. Bennett’s discoveries have literally changed the scientific universe”, says John Mather, one of the principal investigators on COBE, who received the 2006 Nobel Prize in Physics as well as the Gruber Cosmology Prize.

Having far exceeded expectations for the quality and quantity of science it produced, the WMAP science team chose to stop taking data in August 2010. Although nobody expects that the release of the final data analysis in late 2012 will contain surprises, it will nonetheless mark the end of an era — an era that itself marked the dawn of the age of precision cosmology.

Bennett stresses the team nature of the WMAP collaboration. “There are so many heroes who stand up at just the right time and make something happen,” Bennett says, “and they all deserve credit for that.”

The members of the WMAP team are: Chris Barnes, Rachel Bean, Olivier Dore, Joanna Dunkley, Benjamin M. Gold, Michael Greason, Mark Halpern, Robert Hill, Gary F. Hinshaw, Norman Jarosik, Alan Kogut, Eiichiro Komatsu, David Larson, Michele Limon, Stephan S. Meyer, Michael R. Nolta, Nils Odegard, Lyman Page, Hiranya V. Peiris, Kendrick Smith, David N. Spergel, Greg S. Tucker, Licia Verde, Janet L. Weiland, Edward Wollack, and Edward L. (Ned) Wright.

Provided by International Astronomical Union



This PHYSorg Science News Wire page contains a press release issued by an organization mentioned above and is provided to you “as is” with little or no review from Phys.Org staff.

<!–post footer here

print this article
email this article


Digg this


share on Reddit

–>

Article source: http://phys.org/wire-news/101651180/gruber-cosmology-prize-2012-awarded-to-charles-bennett-and-the-w.html

Tags: , , , , <BR/>

30 under 30: An Astronomer Tracing the Universe’s History


Image: Courtesy Eduard Rusu


Gravity’s Engines

We’ve long understood black holes to be the points at which the universe as we know it comes to an end. Often billions of times more massive than the Sun, they…

Read More »

The annual Lindau Nobel Laureate Meeting brings a wealth of scientific minds to the shores of Germany’s Lake Constance. Every summer at Lindau, dozens of Nobel Prize winners exchange ideas with hundreds of young researchers from around the world. Whereas the Nobelists are the marquee names, the younger contingent is an accomplished group in its own right. In advance of this year’s meeting, which focuses on physics, we are profiling several promising attendees under the age of 30. The profile below is the seventh in a series of 30.

Name: Eduard Rusu
Age: 27
Born: Dej, Romania
Nationality: Romanian

Current position: Ph.D. student, The University of Tokyo, National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
Education: Bachelor’s degree in physics from Osaka University, master’s degree in astronomy from the University of Tokyo

What is your field of research?
My focus is the observational study of gravitationally lensed quasars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey with adaptive optics.

What drew you to physics, and to that research area in particular?
Astronomy was my passion from an early age. As a discipline that studies the universe at large, yet in a more visual way than theoretical physics, I think it holds a certain fascination for many people. Astronomy is, after all, the oldest of the sciences. Although perhaps my area of research may appear cryptic, the underlying concept is surprisingly easy to grasp, and visually impactful; I find that an image taken though the telescope or a simulation video impresses people just as much as it first impressed me. Not only because it looks beautiful, but because when I explain what it means, the reaction is usually: “Oh, so that’s what it is!”

Where do you see yourself in 10 years?
I do see myself as an astronomer. There is so much promise in my particular field, particularly with the advent of new astronomical facilities and surveys. I also look forward to expanding my contacts in the world of professional research. I would like to know that my personal research activity ties up with the work of other researcher in the field, and that, as such, I am member of a team that transcends regional boundaries. This is what has motivated me since becoming a foreign student.

Who are your scientific heroes?
Albert Einstein foremost, for his genius. Leonardo da Vinci, not only an artist, but also a scientific and technical visionary. The innumerable others in whose scientific work or life experience I find inspiration.

If you had unlimited resources, what kind of research would you conduct?
As opposed to physics, which is based on experiment, astronomy is based on observation. As such, the most frustrating aspect of my research is that it depends on weather. While I would be faithful to my current research topic, my dream would be to have unlimited observation time, or larger telescopes in space.

What activities outside of physics do you most enjoy?
I love classical music, although I do not play an instrument. I enjoy watching movies, and the history of cinema. Music and film are the most accessible of the performing arts, and I always find conversations on these topics to be engaging and passionate.

What do you hope to gain from this year’s Lindau meeting?
As the Lindau Nobel Meetings in Physics take place about once in four years, and only about 500 young researchers are allowed a one-time participation, one could say that the competition is similar that of the Olympic Games. While the comparison ends here, I see a tremendous opportunity in coming to Lindau, not only to meet and interact with the Nobelists, but to the other young researchers in attendance. To share ideas with fellow researchers, whom otherwise I would not have the opportunity to meet, is a strong incentive for me to attend.

Are there any Nobelists whom you are particularly excited to meet or learn from at Lindau?
John Mather, George Smoot and Brian Schmidt are the three cosmologists participating in this year’s Lindau Nobel Meeting. The importance of their discovery of the anisotropy of the cosmic microwave background radiation and the accelerated expansion of the universe, respectively, cannot be overstated in the current cosmological paradigm. In particular, I have a certain privileged perspective, as I am one of the co-authors of a paper that has confirmed the accelerated expansion of the universe by different means. As such, while there is certainly a “wow!” factor to meeting any Nobelist, I am particularly excited in meeting Brian Schmidt, the winner of last year’s Nobel Prize in Physics. It is thrilling to have the opportunity to meet a Nobelist in my particular field.

Article source: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=lindau-eduard-rusu

Tags: , , , <BR/>

Nobel Prize-Winning Astrophysicist to Speak in Anchorage June 12


ANCHORAGE, Alaska, June 12, 2012 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ –
Presentation on the accelerating universe is free and open to the public.

Astrophysicist Brian P. Schmidt, co-winner of the 2011 Nobel Prize in Physics, is in Anchorage this week for the summer meeting of the American Astronomical Society (AAS). He’ll give a free public talk, “The Accelerating Universe,” on Tuesday evening, June 12th, from 8 to 9 p.m. AKDT in Ballroom B of the Dena’ina Civic Convention Center. Although Dr. Schmidt now works at Australian National University, he grew up in Montana and Alaska, spending part of his youth in Anchorage.

Dr. Schmidt is leader of the High-Redshift Supernova Search Team, one of two groups of astronomers who, in 1998, traced back the expansion of the universe over billions of years and found that it is accelerating. This startling discovery suggests that more than 70% of the cosmos exists in a previously unknown form called dark energy. In his June 12th presentation, free and open to the public, he’ll explain how astronomers have used observations of exploding stars to trace our universe’s history back more than 13 billion years, leading them to ponder the ultimate fate of the cosmos.

The Dena’ina Civic Convention Center is located at 600 W. 7th Ave. in downtown Anchorage. Ballroom B is on the 3rd floor. The AAS, established in 1899 and based in Washington, DC, is the major organization of professional astronomers and planetary scientists in North America. Its membership of about 7,000 also includes physicists, mathematicians, geologists, engineers, and others whose research interests lie within the broad spectrum of subjects now comprising contemporary astronomy. The mission of the AAS is to enhance and share humanity’s scientific understanding of the universe.

SOURCE American Astronomical Society

Copyright (C) 2012 PR Newswire. All rights reserved

Article source: http://www.marketwatch.com/story/nobel-prize-winning-astrophysicist-to-speak-in-anchorage-june-12-2012-06-12

Tags: , , , , , <BR/>

Dark Energy Search Needs Research Funding Boost, Nobel Winners Say

Two winners of the 2011 Nobel prize in physics stressed the importance of science funding.

Tags: , <BR/>

Nobel winners keep eyes on the real prize

Saul Perlmutter, left, Brian Schmidt, center, and Adam Riess at a news conference on Dec. 7 at the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences in Stockholm. The astrophysicists won the 2011 Nobel Prize in physics for their discovery of the accelerating universe.The three scientists who won this year’s Nobel Prize in physics are not resting on their laurels. The astrophysicists received their prizes at a ceremony in Stockholm on Saturday  for the groundbreaking discovery of the accelerated expansion of the universe. But they are already looking forward to the next major breakthroughs in their field.

Email this Article
Add to Newsvine

Tags: , <BR/>

Astronomy Without A Telescope – Inconstant Supernovae?


Any discrepancies in Type 1a supernovae light curves need to be accounted for when we use them as ‘standard candles’ to estimate the nature of the universe. Credit: NASA.

Given the importance of Type 1a supernovae as the standard candles which demonstrate that the universe’s expansion is actually accelerating – we require a high degree of confidence that those candles really are standard.

A paper released on Arxiv, with a list of authors reading like a Who’s Who in cosmology and including all three winners of this year’s Nobel Prize in Physics, details an ultraviolet (UV) analysis of four Type 1a supernovae, three of which represent significant outliers from the standard light curve expected of Type 1a supernovae.

Some diversity in UV output has already been established from observing distant high red-shift Type 1a supernovae, since their UV output is shifted into optical light and can hence be observed through the atmosphere. However, to gain detailed observations in UV, you need to look at closer, less red-shifted Type 1a supernovae and hence you need space telescopes. These researchers used data collected by the ACS (Advanced Camera for Surveys) on the Hubble Space Telescope.

The supernovae studied were SN 2004dt, SN 2004ef, SN 2005M and SN 2005cf. SN 2005cf is considered a ‘gold standard’ Type 1a supernovae – while the other three show considerable diversion from the standard UV light curve, even though their optical light output looks standard.

The left side diagrams show the three anomalous Type 1a supernovae light curves in UV light through three filters. The three outlier supernovae are mapped against the light curve of SN 2005cf (solid line), considered a ‘gold standard’ light curve. The diversity of the other three supernovae is apparent in UV, but not in optical – as shown in the frames on the right side. Credit: Wang et al.

The researchers also looked at a slightly larger dataset of UV supernovae observations made by the Swift spacecraft – which also showed a similar diversity in UV light, that was not apparent in optical light.

This is a bit of a worry, since the supernovae dataset from which we conclude that the universe is expanding is largely based on observations in optical light which, unlike UV, can make it through the atmosphere and be collected by ground-based telescopes.

Nonetheless, if you are thinking that three outliers isn’t a lot – you’d be right. The paper’s aim is to indicate that there are minor discrepancies in the current data set upon which we have built our current model of the universe. The academic muscle that is focused on this seemingly minor issue is some indication of the importance of isolating and characterising the nature any such discrepancies, so that we can continue to have confidence in the Type 1a supernovae standard candle dataset – or not.

The researchers acknowledge that the UV excess – not seen at all in SN 2005cf, but seen in varying degrees in the other three Type 1a supernovae – with the most pronounced difference seen in SN 2004dt – is a problem, even if it is not a huge problem.

As standard candles, Type 1a supernovae (or SNe1a) are key to determining the distance of their host galaxies. A higher than expected UV flux in some SNe1a could enhance their brightness in visible light (in cases where the unexpectedly bright UV is red-shifted into unexpectedly bright blue light). Such SNe1a would then be picked up in ground-based SNe1a sky surveys as misleadingly bright SNe1a – and their host galaxies would be determined as being closer to us than they really are.

The researchers call this another possible systematic error within the current SNe1a-based calculations of the nature of the universe – those other possible systematic errors including the metallicity of the supernovae themselves, as well as the size, density and chemistry of their host galaxy.

The key question to take forward now is what proportion of the total population of SNe1a in the universe might have this high UV flux. To answer that we will need to get more space telescope data.

Further reading:
Wang et al. Evidence for Type Ia Supernova Diversity from Ultraviolet Observations with the Hubble Space Telescope.

Steve Nerlich is a very amateur Australian astronomer, publisher of the Cheap Astronomy website and the weekly Cheap Astronomy Podcasts and one of the team of volunteer explainers at Canberra Deep Space Communications Complex – part of NASA’s Deep Space Network.

Article source: http://www.universetoday.com/90670/astronomy-without-a-telescope-inconstant-supernovae/

Tags: , , , , , <BR/>

‘Dark energy’ headlines College of San Mateo astronomy festival

Dark energy isn’t just the vibe directed at Oakland Raiders opponents when they visit O.co Coliseum.

Scientists suspect it’s essential to the fabric of the space, and it may hold the key to a unifying theory that unlocks the secrets of the universe.

UC Berkeley astronomer Alex Filippenko will discuss dark energy and its role in the accelerating expansion of the universe Saturday night in a presentation at the College of San Mateo. His lecture is a highlight of the college’s Family Science and Astronomy Festival, a free event that also features kid-friendly science demonstrations and telescope viewing.

Filippenko was a member of both research teams credited with the recent discovery that the universe, instead of contracting, will continue to expand at a faster and faster rate. The finding shook up the fields of astronomy and physics, and three men who led those teams were awarded the 2011 Nobel Prize in physics last month.

Filippenko and others have deduced the existence of dark energy based upon the universe’s accelerating expansion. They theorize there is an unseen force overcoming the gravitational pull that would otherwise cause the universe’s expansion to slow down. Understanding this force could yield the Holy Grail of science: a “theory of everything” that resolves the conflict between quantum mechanics and general relativity.

“There are now thousands of physicists trying to figure out what this stuff

is, for at least two reasons,” Filippenko said in a phone interview Friday. “One, it’s three-quarters of the matter and energy content of the universe. And the other is it may be a much-needed observational clue that will help us determine which of the candidate theories of everything is the correct one.”

Filippenko’s talk, “Dark Energy and the Runaway Universe,” may be over the heads of young children, but there will be other activities at the festival designed for elementary-school kids.

“More than anything else, what we are concerned with is raising the awareness of science in the community,” said Mohsen Janatpour, coordinator of the college’s astronomy program. “This event is geared to do that.”

Festival organizers are hoping rain doesn’t interfere with the telescope viewing. Even if the weather is somewhat overcast, Janatpour said, visitors should be able to check out the moon and Jupiter.

The festival is slated to run from 2 p.m. to 11 p.m. at the College of San Mateo’s science building and planetarium. Filippenko’s lecture will be held in the college theater. For information, go to http://collegeofsanmateo.edu/astronomy.

Contact Aaron Kinney at 650-348-4357.

Family Science Astronomy Festival

The festival runs from 2 p.m. to 11 p.m. Saturday at the College of San Mateo’s science building and planetarium.
2 p.m.: Planetarium show
2:30-4:30 p.m.: Science demonstrations
4:30 p.m.: Astronomy events, hands-on workshops
6:30 p.m.: Keynote speech by astronomer Alex Filippenko
9:15-11 p.m.: Telescope viewing

Article source: http://www.mercurynews.com/san-mateo-county-times/ci_19267936?source=rss

Tags: , , , , <BR/>

American astronomers win Nobel Prize for Physics

The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences awarded this year’s Nobel Prize in Physics last Tuesday to three astronomers from the U.S. and Australia for their work demonstrating that a mysterious force, which physicists have named “dark energy,” is causing galaxies to speed apart from each other and may eventually destroy the universe.

Saul Perlmutter of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in Berkeley, Calif., Adam Riess of the Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore, Md., and Brian Schmidt of the Australian National University in Canberra, Australia, shared the Nobel Prize after leading two teams that independently found that dark energy is propelling the expansion of the universe at ever-increasing speeds.

“It was as if, when you tossed your car keys in the air, instead of coming down, they flew faster and faster to the ceiling,” a report in The New York Times describing the groups’ findings read.

These astronomers began studying the light cast off by exploding stars, or supernovae, in the late 1990s in an attempt to measure the rate at which the universe’s expansion was slowing down since the Big Bang 13.7 billion years ago. Instead, they discovered that the universe continues to expand exponentially throughout time, a finding that has amazed and baffled many physicists.

Subsequent research by scientists has indicated that about 70 percent of the universe is comprised of an anti-gravitational force called “dark energy” that pushes matter, such as planets, stars and galaxies outward. Perlmutter, Riess and Schmidt now hypothesize that galaxies will ultimately become so distant from one another that all energy will disappear from the universe.

Charles Nelson, a professor of applied physics and astronomy at Binghamton University, said dark energy is not well understood by physicists because current satellites and telescopes are inadequate to study it properly. He said that telescopes built within the next decade may begin to provide answers.

“The universe has been expanding ever since the Big Bang, but the discovery that it is continuing to increase in size can potentially change how we view things,” Nelson said.

David Rios, a freshman majoring in bioengineering who is enrolled in “PHYS 131: Gen. Physics I (Calculus Based),” said he was intrigued to see “how the discipline of physics will progress now due to this finding.”

NASA has been working to build its James Webb Space Telescope, which is intended to take the place of the Hubble Space Telescope in orbit around the Earth. However, the telescope’s launch is still years away and plans for its development have become bogged down in political battles related to its budget.

The European Space Agency (ESA) has announced it will launch a satellite to study dark energy in 2019.

Jenn Serigano, a senior majoring in physics, said that these findings show that physicists’ understanding of the universe is always evolving.

“As physicists, we use the speed of light as an important constant in our quantum theories. That aspects of the theory of the speed of light are being put into question is what makes physics so exciting,” Serigano said. “Research like this is so valuable because it challenges old theories and produces new ideas … the universe is always expanding and there is still so much we don’t understand yet, but we are learning more all the time. The magnificence of the universe would be sorely underappreciated if it were so easily figured out.”

Article source: http://www2.bupipedream.com/news/american-astronomers-win-nobel-prize-for-physics-1.2641312

Tags: , , , , , , <BR/>

Professor plays role in prize-winning research

University Assitant Professor Saurabh Jha co-authored the High-z
Supernova Search team’s discovery paper in 1998 that explained how
the expansion of the universe was accelerating rather than
decelerating.

This same paper earned the research team’s leaders Brian Schmidt
and Adam Reiss the 2011 Nobel Prize in Physics, which were awarded
last week.

“What astronomers and physicists expected was that if you were to
watch the galaxies for a long time, you would still see them move
apart, but that expansion should be slowing down,” said Jha, an
assistant professor for the Department of Physics and
Astronomy.

But the research showed the universe was in fact moving apart
faster, Jha said.

Edwin Hubble, Hubble Space Telescope’s namesake, discovered that
the universe is expanding in 1929, he said. This means that distant
galaxies are moving away from our Milky Way galaxy, demonstrating
all galaxies are moving apart from other galaxies.

A useful analogy to understand the concept is to imagine throwing a
ball up in the air and watching it rise, Jha said. The ball
represents a galaxy, and as it moves away from us, it shows that
the universe is expanding.

Since we expect the ball to slow down as it moves away, we
eventually expect the ball to stop and come back down, all due to
the force of gravity, he said.

“There is gravity between all the galaxies, too, and so that’s why
everyone expected that the expansion of the universe should be
slowing down as well,” Jha said. 

Scientists believed it was possible for expansion to stop at some
point, resulting in the universe collapsing in on itself — a
scenario called “big crunch,” he said.

Rather than waiting a long time to see what the expansion of the
universe does in the future, both the High-z Supernova Search Team
and fellow researchers at the Supernova Cosmology Project went out
to try to measure this with telescopes to see what it was like in
the past, Jha said.

“We used many telescopes, both on the ground, like at the Cerro
Tololo Inter-American Observatory in Chile, as well as the Hubble
Space Telescope to measure the distance to the supernovas and the
speed at which their galaxies were moving away from us,” he
said.

It is possible to look into the past, because light from objects
that are billions of light-years away can be seen by capturing
pictures from telescopes, Jha said.

“We observed a certain class of objects, exploding stars called
type 1a supernovas, which helped us measure how fast the universe
was expanding in the past,” he said.

To everyone’s surprise, the hypothesis did not match the
observation, and the universe was expanding faster.

“It was as if you threw a ball up in the air, and instead of it
rising and falling back down, it started speeding up faster and
faster. A ball on earth doesn’t do that, but the universe does,” he
said.

The third Nobel Prize laureate, Saul Perlmutter, who was the leader
of the Supernova Cosmology Project team, came to the same
conclusion and received the Nobel Prize independently, Jha
said.

One of the major implications of the research is the discovery that
something has to cause the Universe to expand faster, and no one
knows what it is, Jha said.

“From the measurements and subsequent work, we know that about 70
percent of the universe must be made of this, what we call, ‘dark
energy,’” he said. “That is incomprehensible.”

Eric Gawiser, assistant professor in the Department of Physics and
Astronomy, said the research has raised more questions.   

“We still have no idea what dark energy really is or why it exists,
so this discovery created the biggest current mystery in physics,”
he said

If the dark energy continues to act like it does today, the
universe will continue to expand faster and faster, Jha said.

“That means all the other galaxies that are out there will
eventually get so far away from us that we won’t be able to see
them anymore. So it could be that the universe will become a very
lonely place in the next 100 billion years,” he said.

Many people are working to try to understand the properties of dark
energy more precisely and tell the difference between the different
possibilities, Jha said. It is right at the forefront of modern
astrophysics research.

Jack Hughes, a professor in the Department of Physics and
Astronomy, said the big question in cosmology for the last 70 years
was how fast is the universe slowing down.

“This boiled down to how much matter the universe contained. More
matter [meant] the universe slows down more quickly, less matter
and the universe slows down less quickly,” he said.

But since then discovery theorists are working to come up with
other models to explain the accelerating universe, Hughes
said.

“It is also possible that Einstein’s theory of general relativity
is incomplete and needs to be modified,” he said.

But Albert Einstein might have already come up with an explanation
for the phenomenon, Jha said.

Einstein proposed the theory of the “cosmological constant,” which
argued that empty space itself has a tendency to expand. This
results in the creation of more empty space, which also wants to
expand — creating more empty space at a faster rate.

“Because there was no evidence for this during Einstein’s life, he
is supposed to have called it his ‘greatest blunder,’” he said.
“However, this work shows that Einstein might have been right after
all.”   

Another major implication is measuring how the expansion of the
universe has been changing by figuring out when the expansion
started — that is the beginning of the universe’s “big bang,” Jha
said.

“Based on the supernova measurements and other recent work, we now
know that the Universe is 13.7 billion years old,” he said.

Nobel prizes are not awarded right away — often the prizes are
given many decades after a discovery, when people are able to
determine the importance of a particular discovery, Jha said.

“Since 1998, our two teams’ discovery has been checked and
confirmed with more data and different techniques, such that the
accelerating universe is now an accepted part of astrophysics and
is in all the modern textbooks,” he said. “It really was a
revolution in our understanding of the universe.”

Hughes said the expansion of the universe has dominated the field
of cosmology since the discovery in 1998 for both theorists and
observers.

“Both NASA and the European Space Agency are planning new space
telescopes designed to characterize the properties of the
mysterious ‘dark energy’ that is driving the acceleration of the
universe,” he said.

Article source: http://www.dailytargum.com/news/professor-plays-role-in-prize-winning-research/article_6d951c82-f3ba-11e0-8217-001a4bcf6878.html

Tags: , , , <BR/>