Archive for planetary sciences

Astronomy Club to meet at Sperry Observatory in Cranford on Aug. 25 – Cranford Chronicle

The New Jersey Astronomical Association welcomes long standing member and Vice President Al Witzgall as guest speaker on Aug. 25, at 8:30 p.m. Witzgall’s presentation will be “Meteorites and You – A Guide to Stones From Space.”

Witzgall has been a longstanding member, present Officer, and filled in as Recording Secretary of NJAA. He has also been a member, past officer, and Recording Secretary of “AAI” Amateur Astronomers, Inc.

AAI is one of the largest astronomy clubs in the United States, located at William Miller Sperry Observatory in Cranford. Witzgall is by trade a Senior Optician, having spent some 30 years fabricating precision optics for many research and development companies. His degree, however, is in Earth and Planetary Sciences from Kean University.

Weather permitting; the main telescope and several smaller scopes will be open following the presentation.

Presentations are open free to the general public; however, all donations are welcomed and greatly appreciated.

For more information visit njaa.org. For driving directions, go to google.com/maps and type in New Jersey Astronomical Association.

Article source: http://www.nj.com/cranford/index.ssf/2012/08/astronomy_club_to_meet_at_sper.html

Tags: , , , , <BR/>

Boulder planetary scientists to shine shoes Saturday to highlight budget cuts

If you go

What: Planetary Shoe-Shine

When: 9 a.m. to 1 p.m. Saturday

Where: First United Methodist Church, 1421 Spruce St., Boulder

Cost: Donations

Info: bit.ly/IxQlnG

Some of Boulder’s biggest brains will be on the Pearl Street Mall this weekend — shining shoes.

Local gurus of the cosmos will join their astro-brethren across the country on Saturday for the “Planetary Car Wash Bake Sale,” an event organized by Alan Stern, associate vice president of the Southwest Research Institute’s Space Science and Engineering Division in Boulder, to call attention to the deep budget cuts being proposed for NASA’s planetary science program.

President Barack Obama’s proposed 2013 budget calls for cutting the program by $309 million, a decrease of more than 20 percent. The proposed cuts have spurred planetary scientists into action — writing letters and testifying before Congress — but Stern wanted to get the word out to the general public in a way they’d remember.

“I was looking for something that was different from what we normally do; I wanted it to be fun but attention-getting,” Stern said. “The idea of all these Ph.D.s in all these locations around the country, and graduate students, out there doing things for the public just to get the message out, it gives the right impression.

Researchers in Arizona, Texas, California, Utah, Florida, Maryland, Nevada, Georgia and Pennsylvania all plan to spend their Saturday mornings washing cars and selling baked goods for a nominal fee. The idea, Stern said, is less about actually raising money than about raising awareness.

In Boulder, Stern looked into washing cars and selling homemade treats, but he was stymied on both accounts by local regulations. There are environmental rules that apply to suds getting washed into storm drains and vendor permits that apply to selling baked goods. In fact, even giving away homemade treats on the Pearl Street Mall requires a visit from a health inspector, Stern said.

So Stern chose the next-best thing: shoe shining. (Although he acknowledges that the number of Birkenstock-wearing mall visitors in Boulder may somewhat flummox even that plan.)

The actual shoe-shining operation will be set up a block off of Pearl Street outside the First United Methodist Church, 1421 Spruce St.

But local scientists and graduate students, including folks from the University of Colorado, SwRI and Ball Aerospace, will also man a booth on the mall, directing those with dull-looking shoes — or an interest in chatting about the wonders of the universe with planetary experts — over to the church.

Obama’s proposed budget cuts made headlines earlier this spring, largely because of the anticipated impacts to NASA’s plans to further explore Mars. NASA has already backed away from a partnership with the European Space Agency to launch the Mars Trace Gas Orbiter in 2016 and the ExoMars rover in 2018.

NASA’s Curiosity rover is already en route to the red planet. And NASA’s Mars Atmosphere and Volatile Evolution Mission, or MAVEN — which is being spearheaded by CU — is still on track to launch next year. But scientists say the proposed cuts will diminish NASA’s capacity to build on that momentum.

And while the threat to NASA’s Mars ambitions is real, Stern — the principal investigator on New Horizons NASA’s mission to Pluto — says that cuts to the planetary sciences program will be felt beyond Mars, impacting our ability to learn more about the other planets in our solar system.

This weighs on the mind of Kier Fortier, a member of the CU chapter of Students for the Exploration and Space who plans to participate in Saturday’s planetary shoe shine.

“It worries me that the proposed planetary sciences funding is cut so much,” said Fortier, a junior in aerospace engineering who wants to work on programs that put humans into space after graduation, and, maybe, head into space himself, in an email. “This would lead to the cancellation and reduction of many programs. This would seriously reduce the amount of science that we get back for the money already invested by taxpayers.”

Fortier said he hopes that showing up Saturday will help demonstrate how important the funding issues are to him and his fellow students.

“I hope that when people see all of us shining shoes and essentially groveling on the street that they will see how much we care,” he said. “Also, we will have letters written to members of congress that people can sign and mail. There are a bunch of similar events happening all across the country, and I think that is something that Congress cannot ignore.”

Contact Camera Staff Writer Laura Snider at 303-473-1327 or sniderl@dailycamera.com.

Article source: http://www.dailycamera.com/science-environment/ci_20807376/boulder-planetary-scientists-shine-shoes-saturday-highlight-budget

Tags: , , , , , , <BR/>

Space exploration budget cuts would doom future missions: Ralph P. Harvey

15Gspace.jpgA rocket carrying NASA’s Mars Science Laboratory lifts off from Cape Canaveral, Fla., in November. The proposed budget for the 2013 fiscal year includes a 20 percent cut to planetary funding, which could eliminate several future Mars missions.

I was 8 years old when my parents called me home from a ferocious game of “kick the can” to watch a man from Ohio take a small step . . . onto the surface of the moon. For Neil Armstrong, for me and for millions of young people around the world, it was also a giant leap — a purposeful and inspirational step, taken by a nation choosing not only to face the challenges of the future, but also to create challenges capable of defining how one nation can lead the world.

Flash forward 50 years, and space exploration continues to inspire children to become the scientists and engineers maintaining our nation’s leadership in technical fields. Whether you’re considering intellectual or economic achievements, space exploration plays a key role in making the United States a superpower. It enriches us still further by instilling pride in the nation. Space exploration is one of those rare government-supported efforts with virtually no downside. Our historic achievements in space continue to be worthy of pride and prove the United States can still do what no other nation can, even when events conspire to slow us down.

In general, our government gets this. We all know space exploration can’t be cheap, but steady, modest support — in good economic times and bad — has brought enormous positive returns. Continuing support for planetary sciences has maintained our expertise and technological leadership. It has also allowed us to send rovers to Mars to discover incredible evidence of that planet’s past habitability; to capture cometary dust and bring it back to Earth; to witness water geysers erupting on Saturn’s moon Enceladus; and do dozens of other absolutely incredible things, all challenging and inspiring, that no other nation has done. Almost as amazing is that these incredible discoveries, so defining of our country’s technological expertise, are supported by a tiny fraction of the federal budget — about four hundredths of one percent.

Unfortunately, this may all change if we don’t take action. The administration’s proposed budget for the 2013 fiscal year — now in front of Congress — includes a devastating 20 percent cut to planetary funding. A cut of that scale will eliminate several Mars missions, break international agreements that jointly support other missions, eliminate any large-scale “flagship” missions for the foreseeable future and force us to abandon any plans to explore the potential habitability of the “water moons” Europa and Enceladus, circling Jupiter and Saturn.

Why is it so important to fix this? Can’t planetary exploration handle a little of the economic hardship the rest of us are dealing with? Answering this requires appreciation of two facts.

First is that the proposed cut is hugely disproportionate. While other agencies are being asked to stay the course or slow their growth, planetary exploration is having its guts cut out, with seemingly little regard for its extraordinary long-term value.

Second, for planetary missions (like many things in life), timing is everything. Opportunities to economically launch spacecraft to Mars, a relatively close planet, come by every two years. Opportunities to launch toward outer planets, where spacecraft may need a little gravitational assist from other planets to get there, come along on decadal or even century time scales. Similarly, you can’t switch a Mars rover back on once you’ve turned it off and allowed it to go cold.

In a nutshell, turning off funding now, even if you mean to replace it in the next budget, is likely to kill rather than delay any typical planetary project. It is the equivalent of axing a farmer’s budget in planting season; even if you restore that funding mid-summer, the harvest just isn’t going to be there.

Have we, as a nation, developed enough technology? Are we done with exploring? If your answer to these questions is yes, then the cut makes sense, as does the resulting step away from U.S. leadership in planetary exploration. But I sincerely hope your answer is a resounding “no.” Space exploration is no fantasy; it is something our nation does at a level other nations can only envy, and it has paid us back a thousandfold with incredible discoveries, big dreams and inspiration for new generations.

Now is exactly the wrong time to trade big dreams and inspiration for short-term frugality, and I hope you’ll join me in asking Congress to restore or expand NASA’s planetary science budget.

Ralph P. Harvey is an associate professor in the Department of Earth, Environmental and Planetary Sciences at Case Western Reserve University.

Article source: http://www.cleveland.com/opinion/index.ssf/2012/04/space_exploration_budget_cuts.html

Tags: , , , , , <BR/>

‘Mount Sharp’ on Mars links geology’s past and future


No mission to dared approach it, though, until NASA’s Mars Science Laboratory mission, which this August will attempt to place its one-ton rover, Curiosity, at the foot of the mountain. The moat of flatter ground between the mountain and the crater rim encircling it makes too small a touchdown target to have been considered safe without precision-landing innovations used by this mission.

To focus discussions about how Curiosity will explore the mountain during a two-year prime mission after landing, the mission’s international Project Science Group has decided to call it Mount Sharp. This informal naming pays tribute to geologist Robert P. Sharp (1911-2004), a founder of planetary science, influential teacher of many current leaders in the field, and team member for NASA’s first few Mars missions. Sharp taught geology at the California Institute of Technology (Caltech), in Pasadena, from 1948 until past his retirement. Life magazine named him one of the 10 best college teachers in the nation.

“Bob Sharp was one of the best field geologists this country has ever had,” said Michael Malin, of Malin Space Science Systems, San Diego, principal investigator for two of Curiosity’s 10 and a former student of Sharp’s.

“We don’t really know the origins of Mount Sharp, but we have plans for how to go there and test our theories about it, and that’s just how Bob would have wanted it,” Malin said.

Caltech Provost Edward Stolper, former chief scientist for the Mars Science Laboratory, said, “For much of his more than 50 years at Caltech, Bob Sharp was the central figure in its programs in the geological and planetary sciences. One of his major contributions was the building of a program in planetary sciences firmly rooted in the principles and approaches of the geological sciences.


'Mount Sharp' on Mars links geology's past and future
Enlarge

This image shows the target landing area for Curiosity, the rover of NASA’s Mars Science Laboratory mission. Image Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/ESA/DLR/FU Berlin/MSSS

“Moreover, through his own work on the Jet Propulsion Laboratory’s early missions to Mars and the work of others that he influenced, he also had a major influence on and exploration at JPL. Recognition of this remarkable scientist and leader by the naming of Mount Sharp is highly fitting, and I hope it will serve to perpetuate his legacy.”

The Mars Science Laboratory spacecraft was launched Nov. 26, 2011, bound for landing beside Mount Sharp inside Gale Crater on the evening of Aug. 5, PST (early Aug. 6, EST and Universal Time). The mission will use Curiosity to investigate whether the area has ever offered environmental conditions favorable for fostering microbial life, including chemical ingredients for life and energy for life.

Mount Sharp rises about 3 miles (5 kilometers) above the landing target on the crater floor, higher than Mount Rainier above Seattle, though broader and closer. It is not simply a rebound peak from the asteroid impact that excavated Gale Crater.  A rebound peak may be at its core, but the mountain displays hundreds of flat-lying geological layers that may be read as chapters in a more complex history billions of years old.

Twice as tall as the sequence of colorful bands exposed in Arizona’s Grand Canyon, the stack of layers in Mount Sharp results from changing environments in which layers are deposited, younger on top of older, eon after eon, and then partially eroded away.

Several craters on Mars contain mounds or mesas that may have formed in ways similar to Mount Sharp, and many other ancient craters remain filled or buried by rock layers. Some examples, including Gale, hold a mound higher than the surrounding crater rim, indicating that the mounds are remnant masses inside once completely filled craters. This presents a puzzle about how environmental conditions on Mars evolved.

“This family of craters that were filled or buried and then exhumed or partially exhumed raises the question of what changed,” said Ken Edgett of Malin Space Sciences, principal investigator for one of Curiosity’s instruments. “For a long time, sedimentary materials enter the crater and stay. Then, after they harden into rock, somehow the rock gets eroded away and transported out of the crater.”

Some lower layers of Mount Sharp might tell of a lake within Gale Crater long ago, or wind-delivered sediments subsequently soaked by groundwater. Orbiters have mapped water-telltale minerals in those layers. Liquid water is a starting point in describing conditions favorable for life, but just the beginning of what Curiosity can investigate. Higher layers may be deposits of wind-blown dust after a great drying-out on Mars.

“Mount Sharp is the only place we can currently access on Mars where we can investigate this transition in one stratigraphic sequence,” said Caltech’s John Grotzinger, chief scientist for the Mars . “The hope of this mission is to find evidence of a habitable environment; the promise is to get the story of an important environmental breakpoint in the deep history of the planet. This transition likely occurred billions of years ago — maybe even predating the oldest well-preserved rocks on Earth.”

Possible explanations for how erosion shaped the mountain after layers were deposited include swirling winds carving away the edges, and perhaps later wet episodes leaving channels down the sides and fresher sediments on the crater floor. Clues about those episodes present Curiosity with other potentially habitable environments to investigate. 

Provided by JPL/NASA (news : web)

<!–
–>

Article source: http://www.physorg.com/news/2012-03-mount-sharp-mars-links-geology.html

Tags: , , , , , <BR/>

‘Mount Sharp’ On Mars Links Geology’s Past and Future

One particular mountain on Mars, bigger than Colorado’s grandest, has been beckoning would-be explorers since it was first sighted from orbit in the 1970s. Scientists have ideas about how it took shape in the middle of ancient Gale Crater and hopes for what evidence it could yield about whether conditions on Mars have favored life.

No mission to Mars dared approach it, though, until NASA’s Mars Science Laboratory mission, which this August will attempt to place its one-ton rover, Curiosity, at the foot of the mountain. The moat of flatter ground between the mountain and the crater rim encircling it makes too small a touchdown target to have been considered safe without precision-landing innovations used by this mission.

To focus discussions about how Curiosity will explore the mountain during a two-year prime mission after landing, the mission’s international Project Science Group has decided to call it Mount Sharp. This informal naming pays tribute to geologist Robert P. Sharp (1911-2004), a founder of planetary science, influential teacher of many current leaders in the field, and team member for NASA’s first few Mars missions. Sharp taught geology at the California Institute of Technology (Caltech), in Pasadena, from 1948 until past his retirement. Life magazine named him one of the 10 best college teachers in the nation.

“Bob Sharp was one of the best field geologists this country has ever had,” said Michael Malin, of Malin Space Science Systems, San Diego, principal investigator for two of Curiosity’s 10 science instruments and a former student of Sharp’s.

“We don’t really know the origins of Mount Sharp, but we have plans for how to go there and test our theories about it, and that’s just how Bob would have wanted it,” Malin said.

Caltech Provost Edward Stolper, former chief scientist for the Mars Science Laboratory, said, “For much of his more than 50 years at Caltech, Bob Sharp was the central figure in its programs in the geological and planetary sciences. One of his major contributions was the building of a program in planetary sciences firmly rooted in the principles and approaches of the geological sciences.

“Moreover, through his own work on the Jet Propulsion Laboratory’s early missions to Mars and the work of others that he influenced, he also had a major influence on planetary science and exploration at JPL. Recognition of this remarkable scientist and leader by the naming of Mount Sharp is highly fitting, and I hope it will serve to perpetuate his legacy.”

The Mars Science Laboratory spacecraft was launched Nov. 26, 2011, bound for landing beside Mount Sharp inside Gale Crater on the evening of Aug. 5, PST (early Aug. 6, EST and Universal Time). The mission will use Curiosity to investigate whether the area has ever offered environmental conditions favorable for fostering microbial life, including chemical ingredients for life and energy for life.

Mount Sharp rises about 3 miles (5 kilometers) above the landing target on the crater floor, higher than Mount Rainier above Seattle, though broader and closer. It is not simply a rebound peak from the asteroid impact that excavated Gale Crater. A rebound peak may be at its core, but the mountain displays hundreds of flat-lying geological layers that may be read as chapters in a more complex history billions of years old.

Twice as tall as the sequence of colorful bands exposed in Arizona’s Grand Canyon, the stack of layers in Mount Sharp results from changing environments in which layers are deposited, younger on top of older, eon after eon, and then partially eroded away.

Several craters on Mars contain mounds or mesas that may have formed in ways similar to Mount Sharp, and many other ancient craters remain filled or buried by rock layers. Some examples, including Gale, hold a mound higher than the surrounding crater rim, indicating that the mounds are remnant masses inside once completely filled craters. This presents a puzzle about how environmental conditions on Mars evolved.

“This family of craters that were filled or buried and then exhumed or partially exhumed raises the question of what changed,” said Ken Edgett of Malin Space Sciences, principal investigator for one of Curiosity’s instruments.

“For a long time, sedimentary materials enter the crater and stay. Then, after they harden into rock, somehow the rock gets eroded away and transported out of the crater.”

Some lower layers of Mount Sharp might tell of a lake within Gale Crater long ago, or wind-delivered sediments subsequently soaked by groundwater. Orbiters have mapped water-telltale minerals in those layers. Liquid water is a starting point in describing conditions favorable for life, but just the beginning of what Curiosity can investigate. Higher layers may be deposits of wind-blown dust after a great drying-out on Mars.

“Mount Sharp is the only place we can currently access on Mars where we can investigate this transition in one stratigraphic sequence,” said Caltech’s John Grotzinger, chief scientist for the Mars Science Laboratory.

“The hope of this mission is to find evidence of a habitable environment; the promise is to get the story of an important environmental breakpoint in the deep history of the planet. This transition likely occurred billions of years ago – maybe even predating the oldest well-preserved rocks on Earth.”

Possible explanations for how erosion shaped the mountain after layers were deposited include swirling winds carving away the edges, and perhaps later wet episodes leaving channels down the sides and fresher sediments on the crater floor. Clues about those episodes present Curiosity with other potentially habitable environments to investigate.

Article source: http://www.marsdaily.com/reports/Mount_Sharp_On_Mars_Links_Geology_Past_and_Future_999.html

Tags: , , , <BR/>

American planetary exploration is in grave danger, say scientists

The Obama administration’s proposed 2013 NASA budget focuses almost all the agency’s cuts onto the planetary science program that funds the robotic exploration of the solar system. The Planetary Science Division budget would be cut by 20 percent from $1.5 billion in 2012 to $1.2 billion in 2013. The proposed budget cuts will force the United States to give up its leadership in solar system exploration.

The robotic exploration program has delivered a golden age of planetary exploration including the Mars rovers; the Cassini mission to Saturn; MESSENGER, which is now orbiting Mercury; Dawn, orbiting the asteroid Vesta; and the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter and GRAIL, which are orbiting our Moon to explore its structure and origins.

“If the NASA budget is passed in its current form, American leadership in planetary sciences will be endangered,” said Dan Britt, chair of Division for Planetary Sciences of the American Astronomical Society (AAS). “We strongly believe that the robotic exploration of the solar system resonates with the American people, that it is something that NASA needs to be doing, and it is something the American people will support even in tight budget times.”

Under the proposed budget, NASA will be forced to cancel its plans for its most ambitious exploration missions, slash the Mars Exploration Program, and kill the Lunar Quest Program. The cuts will also end collaborations with the European Space Agency on the 2016 Mars Trace Gas Orbiter and the 2018 ExoMars rover, delay the economical Discovery and New Frontiers space programs, and force cuts in operations and data analysis for a number of current missions.

The planetary science community recently finished its latest decadal survey, Vision and Voyages for Planetary Science, under the auspices of the National Research Council. It recommends to NASA a program of balanced exploration and scientific analysis. Under the president’s proposal, implementation of the balanced, consensus, budget-conservative plan outlined in the decadal survey will not be possible.

Article source: http://www.astronomy.com/~/link.aspx?_id=81fcc02e-2cc4-463f-b4a7-84563a93cfcc

Tags: , , , , , , <BR/>

WU professor joins Mars rover project to study soil

Mars rover Curiosity, the centerpiece of NASA’s Mars Science Laboratory mission is pictured here. This image, taken on June 29, 2010, shows Curiosity with its mobility system—wheels and suspension—in place after installation at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif.Courtesy of NASA/JPL-Caltech

Mars rover Curiosity, the centerpiece of NASA’s Mars Science Laboratory mission is pictured here. This image, taken on June 29, 2010, shows Curiosity with its mobility system—wheels and suspension—in place after installation at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif.

The Washington University professor who spent several years as deputy principal coordinator for the Mars rover Opportunity was recently selected to contribute to a new rover mission.

Ray Arvidson, a professor in the department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, will be assisting both operationally, to help the new Curiosity rover route the safest path along Martian terrains, as well as scientifically, to study the soils found.

Arvidson was one of 29 individuals selected for the position at the Mars Science Laboratory, out of a total applicant pool of 150. His proposal suggested the rover should be used to observe terramechanics, or study the soil on the planet.

“My role will be to use Curiosity as a virtual instrument to simulate drives across terrains traversed and to be traversed by the rover,” Arvidson wrote in an email to Student Life. “This will help the engineers plan drives that are safe and will also allow me to retrieve soil properties of relevance to understanding Martian geological history.”

Curiosity, which launched Nov. 26 of last year, is scheduled to land on Mars in August. While previous rovers have explored for water, the new mission is geared toward searching for potentially habitable regions of the planet.

Third-year graduate student Abigail Fraeman, who is also involved in the project, said although the rover still has many months before its scheduled landing date, there is much work to be done in order to prepare it.

“This work will be useful for figuring out how best to drive Curiosity, including how to avoid any potential rover sand-traps,” she said. “Unfortunately, you can’t just dig out a rover stuck on Mars, so guiding Curiosity to safe terrains will be incredibly important to ensure the vehicle stays mobile and able to drive to the most interesting targets.”

Planning the rover’s route will involve predicting the surface terrain and how the rover will operate on it. That will mean studying data taken by instruments on satellites orbiting the red planet, as well as the data that will be collected by the rover itself.

Arvidson conducted similar research on both of his previous rover projects—Spirit and Opportunity.

“Our department is well known across the world for Mars research,” Douglas Wiens, chairman of the University’s Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, said. “The new project will strengthen our reputation and fund graduate students to carry out their thesis work on Mars.”

Arvidson’s team will be using a computer model of the rover to simulate Curiosity’s actual travels across the surface of the planet. The team will search for the least perilous route for the rover to take across Mars.

The team will also archive the data collected from the rover’s instruments from the department’s NASA Planetary Data System Geosciences Node.

The information will also be released to the public, free of charge.

“The work is important scientifically because it will give us an understanding of the soil properties at Curiosity’s landing site in Gale Crater,” Fraeman said. “It will provide additional insight into the mechanics of driving vehicles on other planets.”

Article source: http://www.studlife.com/news/national-news/2012/02/06/wu-professor-joins-mars-rover-project-to-study-soil/

Tags: , , , <BR/>

Professor builds laser to disintegrate Martian rocks

Last June, Seattle University professor Christopher Stipe’s phone rang.

It was NASA.

The company he worked for, Photon Machines, was asked by the national agency to help with the development of an instrument that uses Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy, or LIBS, to age date rocks on planets, namely Mars. Being very experienced with the technology, Stipe was the best man for the job.

“The whole idea is to age date the various terrains on Mars into what chronological order and what absolute time some of these planetary wide major events happened on Mars,” said project mentor George Rossman, who works in the Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences at Caltech University.

The instrument being developed has two main components: the LIBS system and a mass spectrometer which is used to find the chemical structures of molecules. By utilizing a reverse-moving method similar to the oft-noted carbon-dating, this device uses potassium-argon, or K-AR, dating to pinpoint the creation time of particular volcanic rocks.

The two parts of the device are completed and a combined instrument is in the process of being designed.

Stipe’s piece of the instrument will measure the radio isotope potassium 40. This isotope will decay over time. As it decays, it breaks down and form calcium 40 and argon 40. By examining the ratios between these three substances, scientists can deduce how long the material has been decaying.

This portion of the instrument aims to utilize the LIBS technique to date igneous Martian rocks in this manner.

“The time that you’re actually measuring from is from when that rock was at one point a liquid to the time when youmake the measurement,” said Stipe.

The device uses a laser to send a small pulse of light focused on a small piece of the rock to create a plasma, or a gas of charged particles.

The plasma is composed of electrons and charged atoms from the rock. As the plasma cools after the laser pulse, the electrons return to the charged atoms and give off specific colors of light.

It is this light that interests Stipe.

“You can measure that light and that’s like a chemical signature of the thing that’s giving off the light,” Stipe said. “How big those peaks are correlates with how much potassium is in the rock.”

Though Stipe has been working with the LIBS system for several years, he only started this project about a year ago.

After a successful phase one of the project, Stipe is moving into phase two, which involves testing his instrument with different sample preparation methods.

“Certainly age dating of rocks I think has been a dream, an unrealizable dream, for most people in the geology business,” said Michael Hecht, senior research scientist for the NASA Jet Propulsion Lab, or JPL, at Caltech University. “What geologists are interested in is history…they’re interested in how things came to be the way they are.”

Hecht is building another portion of the device, working closely with Stipe.

Rossman is also involved with the construction of the device. He notes that he has been involved in many projects over the years, and that he is very excited about this one.

“When did the cratering end? When did the atmosphere disappear? When did it become a CO₂ planet? Things like that. By looking at the rock records, one can see when various geological things happened that may coincide with these other events.”

Space on Martian rovers is limited, NASA can only include so many instruments within the robotic vehicle. Though Rossman believes that the LIBS idea is a competitive contender, there are no guarantees that the device will be used in space.

“They have all these different priorities and this is one of the highest priorities so I think it has a chance but you just never know,” Stipe said.

Half of the funding for the project came from the Keck Institute for Space Studies at Caltech with NASA matching it through their JPL funds.

However, according to Hecht, much of that money has already been depleted and more funding is currently not expected.

“I’m generally an optimist and my thinking is that if we got there, the chances of finding an opportunity for it to fly would be very good because a lot of people want to do this measurement,” Hecht said. “But we can’t just stand up and say ‘give us $50 million and we’ll build it for you’ because we haven’t demonstrated its feasibility yet and it’s performance.”

Article source: http://www.su-spectator.com/news/professor-builds-laser-to-disintegrate-martian-rocks-1.2655691

Tags: , , , , , , <BR/>

Recommended: Dwarf planet’s downsizing confirmed

NASA / JPL-Caltech

It turns out that Eris, shown in this artist’s conception, may be Pluto’s denser twin.

It’s been almost a year since astronomers suggested that Eris, the icy world whose discovery prompted Pluto’s controversial reclassification in 2006, wasn’t as big as they originally thought. Now the official word has leaked out unofficially: Pluto just might be the largest dwarf planet after all — although Eris is still seen as more massive.

The latest measurements were reported last week in Nantes, France, at a joint meeting of the American Astronomical Society’s Division of Planetary Sciences and the European Planetary Science Congress. But as the Planetary Society’s Emily Lakdawalla explains, it took a while for the report to become public, due to worries about the journal Nature’s rules on embargoes and confidentiality.

Here are the statistics: Based on measurements made last November during the dwarf planet’s occultation of a faraway star, Eris’ diameter is estimated at 2,326 kilometers (1,445 miles). A similar set of measurements, published in 2009. estimated that Pluto was at least 2,338 kilometers (1,453 miles). When you include the margin of error, Pluto is essentially Eris’ equal in size.


Send idea Send me your story ideas

Facebook Follow us on Facebook

Twitter Follow me on Twitter

“It could be smaller, it could be larger; basically, it is a twin,” Lakdawalla quoted Paris Observatory astronomer Bruno Sicardy, the lead researcher for the Eris measurements, as saying at the conference.

Lakdawalla held back from reporting what Sicardy said because she was asked to. The research paper about the measurements is under consideration for publication in Nature, and Sicardy said the journal’s editors told him he could discuss the results only if he instructed his audience not to report them publicly. The implication was that Sicardy’s paper would be tossed out if his team’s findings appeared in the press.

The audience was all abuzz about the findings, of course, but Lakdawalla said she wouldn’t “break anything until somebody else breaks it.”

She did, however, refer to the zipped-lip situation in a Twitter message to Embargo Watch’s Ivan Oransky. Long story short, Oransky checked with Nature and was told that “researchers with papers in submission at a Nature journal can certainly present at a scientific meeting but shouldn’t court the press.” Oransky blogs about the back-and-forth today on Embargo Watch, but the bottom line is that Sicardy needn’t have feared having his paper rejected, as long as he confined his public remarks to the presentation.

If Nature sticks to the reported publication plan, the paper will be published on Oct. 26. Today, a lot of the details came out not only on Lakdawalla’s blog, but also on Scientific American’s Observations blog — which is interesting, because Scientific American is part of the Nature Publishing Group. (SciAm’s John Matson helpfully included a link to Sicardy’s conference report.)

So what else do Sicardy and his colleagues say? Although Pluto and Eris are roughly the same size, Eris is more massive, which implies it’s “mainly composed of rocky material, with a relatively thin ice mantle,” the astronomers say. They suggest that Eris once had a thicker layer of ice, most of which was “blasted away” as the result of a catastrophic cosmic collision.

Sicardy and his colleagues also note that when you factor in Eris’ distance, its observed brightness and its relatively small size, the dwarf planet stands out as one of the brightest bodies in the solar system, after the Saturnian moons Tethys and Enceladus. They suggest that the dwarf planet is so bright because it has a surface layer of nitrogen or methane frost, due to the freezing-out of its atmosphere.

A similar freeze-out might well happen on Pluto as it heads out to the farthest point of its orbit around the sun. Eris, meanwhile, is coming closer to the sun — and at some point the nitrogen or methane might thaw back into the atmosphere.

The two worlds seem destined to stand in the planetary pantheon as separated twins — in possession of moons, seasons, their own distinctive geologies and potentially some kind of cryovolcanic activity. Should they really be regarded as non-planets, or is it better to see them as a different class of planets? I argue for the latter in my book, “The Case for Pluto,” but I’d love to hear what you think. Please feel free to add your comments below.

More about dwarfs and other planets:


Connect with the Cosmic Log community by “liking” the log’s Facebook page, following @b0yle on Twitter or adding me to your Google+ circle.

Article source: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/10/12/8292791-dwarf-planets-downsizing-confirmed

Tags: , , <BR/>

Venus Ozone Layer Spotted – Can the Planet Support Life?

The spectral signature of the ozone was what gave it away, said Franck Montmessin of the LATMOS atmospheric research center in France and lead author of the study identifying the atmospheric molecules. ”The spectral signature of ozone, a distinctive absorption band at [ultraviolet] wavelengths, was rather pronounced and we could clearly discern it in our plots with the naked eye,” said Dr. Montmessin speaking to ICARUS, the official publication of the Division for Planetary Sciences of the American Astronomical Society at Cornell University.

On Earth, the ozone layer was initially the result of oxygen being produced by prehistoric microbes as a waste product 2.4 billion years ago and continues to be replenished by microbes and oxygen-emitting plant life. Ozone, whose molecules are comprised of three oxygen atoms, had previously only been detected in the atmospheres of Earth and Mars and had been thought of as a possible indicator of life. However, the modest concentration indicates that Venus’ ozone layer is most likely not a biological product. According to ESA, astrobiologists theorize that “a planet’s ozone concentration must be 20% of Earth’s value before life should be considered as a cause.” The ozone found in Mars’ atmosphere, for example, has not been generated by life, but is instead the result of sunlight breaking up carbon dioxide molecules; the Venusian ozone is likely to have a similar type of origin.

Though the new discovery does not immediately indicate life on Venus, it has important ramifications for the continued study of astrobiology. Håkan Svedhem, ESA Project Scientist for the Venus Express mission asserts that these findings greatly expand our understanding of the chemistry of Venus’ atmosphere. “Beyond that,” Dr. Svedham says, “it is yet more evidence of the fundamental similarity between the rocky planets, and shows the importance of studying Venus to understand them all.”

Follow us on LinkedIn LinkedIn

Article source: http://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/articles/227729/20111009/venus-ozone-layer-spotted-can-the-planet-support-life-esa.htm

Tags: , , , , , , <BR/>